Archives

People Who Still Have Blogs:

  • Me

Archives

mySQL error with query SELECT itime, SUBSTRING(itime,1,4) AS Year, SUBSTRING(itime,6,2) AS Month, SUBSTRING(itime,9,2) as Day FROM kyle_nucleus_item WHERE iblog=1 and itime <="2018-08-19 03:14:47" and idraft=0 GROUP BY Year, Month ORDER BY itime DESC: Expression #1 of SELECT list is not in GROUP BY clause and contains nonaggregated column 'nucleus.kyle_nucleus_item.itime' which is not functionally dependent on columns in GROUP BY clause; this is incompatible with sql_mode=only_full_group_by

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional
Valid CSS

The Man Who Cried Wolf in His Youth

As of this writing, two things are true.

Reasonable people are looking at facts and actions available in the public record and coming to the conclusion that the Trump administration is acting like a guilty criminal party would, and that there is a whole lot of circumstantial evidence that they did commit a crime.

What is also true, is that the GOP representatives are largely doing nothing, possibly, with good reason, as the President still enjoys a nearly 40% job approval rating.

That seems like a very high number. Far too high to just say "They dumb".

I have a hypothesis.

For the last eight years of the Obama administration, the GOP and its supporters transformed what it meant to be the opposition party.

Certainly, the case could be made that the GOP party of the 90's, who successfully indicted the democratic president via nakedly partisan reasons that in hindsight, few people would construe as "high crimes and misdemeanors" that in any way jeopardized the country.

But even then, the opposition party limited itself to using the existing *facts* to make political attacks. Their tether to reality thin, but at least attached.

The election of Barrack Obama as President snapped this tether completely. Largely, because President Obama was careful, and never gave them substantive facts to use against him.

Here is some of the stuff they did:

  • Called him a liar.
  • Tried to stop every action he took, regardless of merit
  • Raised questions of his legitimacy as a president via his birthplace and parentage
  • Claimed he was a secret Muslim working against America
  • Had numerous radio and television stations pushing outrage that was primarily motivated by entertainment and politics foremost, journalistic accuracy third, if at all.

So look at that list, and compare it to the current claims against President Trump:

  • That he and his staff frequently lie.
  • That the democrats and courts have blocked many of his actions.
  • Raise evidence that Russians intervened in the election on behalf of Trump
  • Claiming he seems to have significant ties to a foreign power
  • Multiple newspapers leaking damaging stories about him

After eight years of doing it, Trump supporters believe what they were doing was and is acceptable and normal. That it was the job of the opposition party to make things up and scream.

They either kinda, sortknew it was made up, and/or grew so mad that the rest of the country ignored those facts, that they assumed the "other side" was brainwashed and can't be trusted.

Either case would mean a Trump supporter, hearing the above news, would assume that it was either fueled by the same, fact-free generated fake outrage that their critiques of Obama were, or that they alone are the ones with access to accurate news reporting, and "the other side" simply has incorrect facts.

The attacks seem equivalent, and since the ones they made against Obama were complete fabrications that ultimately led nowhere, they believe the same must be true of the Trump attacks..

The moral of the story of "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" is that integrity is important, lest everyone ignore you. However, as that boy grew into a man, surely one lesson he learned was "Don't trust anybody who cries wolf, because they are all untrustworthy, self-serving pieces of shit"

Search