Archives

People Who Still Have Blogs:

  • Me

Archives

May, 2017
March, 2017
December, 2016
November, 2016
August, 2016
July, 2016
April, 2016
January, 2016
December, 2015
November, 2015
October, 2015
June, 2015
May, 2015
April, 2015
February, 2015
January, 2015
December, 2014
September, 2014
August, 2014
July, 2014
June, 2014
May, 2014
April, 2014
March, 2014
February, 2014
January, 2014
December, 2013
November, 2013
October, 2013
September, 2013
August, 2013
July, 2013
June, 2013
May, 2013
November, 2012
October, 2012
September, 2012
August, 2012
July, 2012
June, 2012
March, 2012
February, 2012
January, 2012
December, 2011
November, 2011
September, 2011
August, 2011
July, 2011
June, 2011
May, 2011
April, 2011
March, 2011
February, 2011
January, 2011
December, 2010
November, 2010
October, 2010
September, 2010
August, 2010
June, 2010
May, 2010
March, 2010
February, 2010
January, 2010
November, 2009
October, 2009
September, 2009
August, 2009
July, 2009
June, 2009
May, 2009
April, 2009
March, 2009
February, 2009
January, 2009
December, 2008
November, 2008
October, 2008
September, 2008
August, 2008
July, 2008
June, 2008
May, 2008
April, 2008
March, 2008
February, 2008
January, 2008
December, 2007
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
August, 2007
July, 2007
June, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
November, 2006
October, 2006
September, 2006
August, 2006
July, 2006
June, 2006
May, 2006
April, 2006
March, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006
November, 2005
October, 2005
September, 2005
August, 2005
July, 2005
June, 2005
March, 2005
January, 2005
December, 2004
November, 2004
August, 2004
July, 2004
June, 2004
May, 2004
April, 2004
March, 2004
February, 2004
January, 2004
December, 2003
November, 2003
October, 2003
September, 2003
August, 2003
July, 2003
May, 2003
April, 2003
March, 2003
February, 2003
January, 2003
December, 2002

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional
Valid CSS

The First Law

In the beginning of war, men fought men.

These days it is complicated. Some war is still men fighting men. Some is men in vehicles fighting other men, those men may also be in vehicles. Battleships shell the earth. Submarines haunt the sea. A hallmark of war is that none participating in it should sleep soundly.

The one major time we strained from this model was the deployment of auto-nonomous mechanical robots, buried in the ground, with the instructions to kill or maim whoevever triggers them. It may seem strange to talk about landmines as "robots", but in regard that they are mechanical agents who are charged with deciding who to employ lethal force on, the glove seems to fit.

Wholesale landmine use in wars has widely been regarded as a pretty terrible idea. Yet it serves as an interesting analog to the current state of warfare.

Teleoperated warmachines are not breaking news. As was fortold by Robin Williams 1992 movie Toys, we've been using them for ten years now to drop missiles on places we'd rather not physically go. The US isn't even unique in this regard, 30+ other countries are actively using drones in their militaries.

It is important to discuss because it breaks the unspoken rule of war, that all participants should be in some state of mortal terror.

This is what makes war difficult to employ. It makes recruitment, training and retention all very difficult. So much of the military structure revolves around it "follow orders!" , "glory in death", "serve your country". They are necessary incentives to get rational humans to perform actions which might lead to their harm or death.

I don't mean to disparage it, I don't think anybody going to sign up for any branch of service is diluded or tricked about the risks involved with the dictionary definition of the job they are electing to do. There is still a nobility there.

This virtue is easier seen when you imagine it not being there. If joining the army was as simple as showing up to work in a big bland office building, going to your cubicle, and driving around a remotely operated shotgun strapped to a camera in a country you probably don't not know the capital of.

When those participants no longer have to ante in any slice of their mortality into the pot, it alters the game entirely.

The distinction between war and murder has always been a murky one. Killing someone who was threatening your person is generally labeled "Self Defense" (a.k.a. Not Murder). War against an unarmed peoples is generally not considered war, but slaughter (a.k.a. Lots of Murder). It seems mutual peril is an important element in making it tolerable to cease a human life on purpose.

So what if it isn't there?

What if it is not difficult to find people willing to kill others for a paycheck? What if you don't have to train them, house them, feed them and dangle the promise of an educated future to get them to do that for you? What if people would literally kill for minimum wage?

The thing I worry about is not that our war machines will become fully-autnomous Skynet overlords. I worry that we will finally invent a way to make humans make life or death decisions with the callous boredom of a machine.

Search