People Who Still Have Blogs:

  • Me


August, 2018
July, 2018
December, 2017
September, 2017
August, 2017
May, 2017
March, 2017
December, 2016
November, 2016
August, 2016
July, 2016
April, 2016
January, 2016
December, 2015
November, 2015
October, 2015
June, 2015
May, 2015
April, 2015
February, 2015
January, 2015
December, 2014
September, 2014
August, 2014
July, 2014
June, 2014
May, 2014
April, 2014
March, 2014
February, 2014
January, 2014
December, 2013
November, 2013
October, 2013
September, 2013
August, 2013
July, 2013
June, 2013
May, 2013
November, 2012
October, 2012
September, 2012
August, 2012
July, 2012
June, 2012
March, 2012
February, 2012
January, 2012
December, 2011
November, 2011
September, 2011
August, 2011
July, 2011
June, 2011
May, 2011
April, 2011
March, 2011
February, 2011
January, 2011
December, 2010
November, 2010
October, 2010
September, 2010
August, 2010
June, 2010
May, 2010
March, 2010
February, 2010
January, 2010
November, 2009
October, 2009
September, 2009
August, 2009
July, 2009
June, 2009
May, 2009
April, 2009
March, 2009
February, 2009
January, 2009
December, 2008
November, 2008
October, 2008
September, 2008
August, 2008
July, 2008
June, 2008
May, 2008
April, 2008
March, 2008
February, 2008
January, 2008
December, 2007
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
August, 2007
July, 2007
June, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
November, 2006
October, 2006
September, 2006
August, 2006
July, 2006
June, 2006
May, 2006
April, 2006
March, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006
November, 2005
October, 2005
September, 2005
August, 2005
July, 2005
June, 2005
March, 2005
January, 2005
December, 2004
November, 2004
August, 2004
July, 2004
June, 2004
May, 2004
April, 2004
March, 2004
February, 2004
January, 2004
December, 2003
November, 2003
October, 2003
September, 2003
August, 2003
July, 2003
May, 2003
April, 2003
March, 2003
February, 2003
January, 2003
December, 2002

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional
Valid CSS

The Art of Doing

My favorite thing about the world is how unintuitive it is.

I'm always fascinated by the clever innovations that the masters of various fields have come to, whether it be dish washing tricks for handling small bowls of sour cream, hired movers using long pieces of cloth to carry 8 ft stacks of boxes down narrow steps or cabinet installers methods for making everything come out flush and square.

You'd think in the field of computers everything would be the opposite, all logical math that holds no secrets.

The truth of it, is it is often less intuitive. The physical world has unalterable rules everyone agrees upon. The virtual ones are spun adhoc by people who think they're vision of birthing "active logic" is clear and straightforward.

Peoples' brains work differently. Some people, without knowing it, assign "morality" to some ideas and concepts and avoid or embrace certain approaches based on that bias. Others try to make the virtual world model the simplicity of the physical one, without taking into account the inherent grace and complexity of the actual world.

And of course, at some point those two worlds have to meet for anything useful to happen.

This weekend I was working on a simple project, to translate the pushing of a physical button to that of a virtual "button press" in a computer to trigger an event.

This seems intuitively straightforward. Button goes down, computer receives that signal, does a thing. Where is there room for unintuitive goblins to hide there?

The truth of it, is that when a physical button is pressed down, it does not yield a "clean" signal to the computer.

When the button is pressed down by our meaty finger, and makes initial contact it often *bounces* the spring terminal away. The computer watches so fast that it often sees a confident button press as a pattern of 3-5 "on/off" signals in quick succession before the kinetic energy of the button press and spring settle down and it becomes a solid, reliable "on".

Experts in the field know this as "debouncing", and is a thing they handle routinely. But for me, someone who presses buttons connected to computers for decades, it never occurred to me that my interaction with computers was so "messy", and what I had estimated was a program that would take 5 minutes to write became a much longer and frustrating endeavor as reality stubbornly refused to yield to my internal conception of it.

To turn a phrase: "It is annoying gotchas all the way down."

The gulf between learning the calculus of static engineering and the ability to shim and lash solid objects into immobility is vast, and it seems like we lack a formal mechanism for transmitting the latter to future generations.

There is often talk of a "knowledge vault" where humanity would record all our scientific progress. I suspect if a future generation of humanity ever needed to rely on the totality of our theoretical knowledge sans the practical wisdom of using it, that rather than hailing their progenitors as advanced gods, the future post-apocalyptic generation would just declare us "total dicks".