Archives

People Who Still Have Blogs:

  • Me

Archives

September, 2017
August, 2017
May, 2017
March, 2017
December, 2016
November, 2016
August, 2016
July, 2016
April, 2016
January, 2016
December, 2015
November, 2015
October, 2015
June, 2015
May, 2015
April, 2015
February, 2015
January, 2015
December, 2014
September, 2014
August, 2014
July, 2014
June, 2014
May, 2014
April, 2014
March, 2014
February, 2014
January, 2014
December, 2013
November, 2013
October, 2013
September, 2013
August, 2013
July, 2013
June, 2013
May, 2013
November, 2012
October, 2012
September, 2012
August, 2012
July, 2012
June, 2012
March, 2012
February, 2012
January, 2012
December, 2011
November, 2011
September, 2011
August, 2011
July, 2011
June, 2011
May, 2011
April, 2011
March, 2011
February, 2011
January, 2011
December, 2010
November, 2010
October, 2010
September, 2010
August, 2010
June, 2010
May, 2010
March, 2010
February, 2010
January, 2010
November, 2009
October, 2009
September, 2009
August, 2009
July, 2009
June, 2009
May, 2009
April, 2009
March, 2009
February, 2009
January, 2009
December, 2008
November, 2008
October, 2008
September, 2008
August, 2008
July, 2008
June, 2008
May, 2008
April, 2008
March, 2008
February, 2008
January, 2008
December, 2007
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
August, 2007
July, 2007
June, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
November, 2006
October, 2006
September, 2006
August, 2006
July, 2006
June, 2006
May, 2006
April, 2006
March, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006
November, 2005
October, 2005
September, 2005
August, 2005
July, 2005
June, 2005
March, 2005
January, 2005
December, 2004
November, 2004
August, 2004
July, 2004
June, 2004
May, 2004
April, 2004
March, 2004
February, 2004
January, 2004
December, 2003
November, 2003
October, 2003
September, 2003
August, 2003
July, 2003
May, 2003
April, 2003
March, 2003
February, 2003
January, 2003
December, 2002

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional
Valid CSS

Object Oriented

I am haunted by the clacking sound of the biological dominoes already in motion that will eventually result in me being responsible for a teenage girl.

Which is probably why these two recent studies caught my eye:

The first is the terrifying notion that girls as young as 6 years old want to look "sexy".

The second is a psychological study about how the brains of both men and woman are tend to view men as a whole entities and women as parts.

There is another study mentioned in the first article also discussing how "sexy clothing" in young girls only leads to be being popular... among other girls.

Taken together, I think it forms a different narrative than the standard "male dominated sexualized culture causing low self-esteem", I'm sure we're guilty of that, and I'm not letting guys off the hook.

But it seems clear that there is also a feedback loop in young girls peer groups where they pick up on, some level, that sexy clothes are equated with some form of power, or successfully risks the most anatomical scrutiny of peers.

Especially since the second study never mentions whether this also makes woman more likely to view *themselves* as a collection of district parts in a way that maybe men don't?

It even seems to hint that maybe one thing that railroaded the modern feminist movement *was* the freedom to buck trends of modesty and, as a culture, wear more revealing clothes, which then made both men and woman move obsessed with the abundance of more exposed parts.

It makes me also wonder what affect burkas have on the perception of females. Forced burka policies are the hallmark of a gender oppressive country, but what if they began being donned not for government or religious reasons, but as a voluntary feminist solution to solve the biological distractions that keep all of us from parsing women as whole entities?

A father can dream.

Abstraction

My first existential crisis began around fourth grade when the teacher told us that everything was made of atoms, little tiny building blocks of life.

My mind flooded with the logical consequences of this new world view. I had always thought of humans as large, indivisible things. Composed 100% Grade A "human". But tiny building blocks, essentially, picolegos? Suddenly the class of my peers seemed to resemble a pack of grinning meat golems.

Legos are apt. Properly constructed they all click into exact place, unchanging, no room for anything. No Lego setsinclude a tiny, translucent jelly like "soul" block that you can sort of try to imbue your lego man with. There just isn't room for it.

A guy who writes music for a living once noted that "Knowledge is a fractal thing", and the statement "we're made up of tiny building blocks called atoms" is a level of knowledge toward the truth. But it is also a dangerously attractive abstraction of the truth, for instead of hinting at further wonders and complexities of atomic theory (e.g. that the "blocks" are actually energy spheres made up of 3x discrete types which mainly lord over a whole lot of nothingness), it seems to provide a comfortable stopping point of any further investigation.

In some ways, the idea that all the kids in my class are made up of tiny blocks is far easier to grasp and serves to mask the greater, head splitting complexities of the modern world. It allows you to model *others* as knowable, static things. It also silently frames what matters, just matter.

It seems complex. 30 kids times a very large number of atoms per kid. That is the ultimate tally, right?

While it is tempting to picture ourselves as super complex minerals, I think it does a great disservice to the truly cosmically wonderful thing about humans, our ability to create system after system that each verge on infinite complexity.

Even starting with simple biology, the dance of gas molecules being exchanged by the rapid breathing of a classroom of children, the cross-pollination of helpful and harmful bacteria and the resulting microbiological battles and peace that ensues from a single slobbered drink fountain nozzle.

From an economic stand point, the possessions in their desk alone infer a complex tale of man hours spent, manufacturing machines, training, marketing, shipping logistics, each of which has an intricately complex economic purpose and motivation.

Socially, all 30 of these children are looking about capturing up to 10 unique views each second, on the playground they all attempt to play or change their perceived role in the hierarchy in each of their heads. This doesn't seem like much, because we do it so easily. The number of possible individual relationships in a set of 30 is 30 factorial.

A rough estimate for the number of atoms in a fourth grader is a number starting with 2 and ending with 27 zeros, multiplied by 30 this becomes a 6 followed by 28 zeros. The number of possible perceived social hiarachys in a set of 30 children is a number that starts with 2 and ends with 32 zeros, a number fifty thousand times larger.

I haven't even touched upon the complexity of our electrical, water, information, heating and transpiration infrastructure, especially once it is teeming with individual agents.

Before fractal geometry came along the mathematicians would label any shape or object that couldn't be expressed via their geometry "a monster".

This is what I like to think is special about human beings. Everything else in the universe trends towards simplicity. Suns politely degrade until they violently stop being suns. Objects in motion keep on chugging unless given a reason not to. Energy finds its path to lower and lower states.

But not humans. We not only buck the trend of entropy, we violate it on several different orders of mathematical infinity.

We are not the equivalent of slime lizards clinging to a wet rock. We are a planet of ridiculous Godzillas, stomping on the customs of reality with an amplitude that increases by an order of magnitude every decade.

So often, staring into the sky can make it seem like we are insignificant mistakes. Whenever you feel that way, take a moment to try to work out what 7 billion factorial is in your head, and then ponder whether the Universe might actually be in awe of us.

Search