Archives

People Who Still Have Blogs:

  • Me

Archives

September, 2017
August, 2017
May, 2017
March, 2017
December, 2016
November, 2016
August, 2016
July, 2016
April, 2016
January, 2016
December, 2015
November, 2015
October, 2015
June, 2015
May, 2015
April, 2015
February, 2015
January, 2015
December, 2014
September, 2014
August, 2014
July, 2014
June, 2014
May, 2014
April, 2014
March, 2014
February, 2014
January, 2014
December, 2013
November, 2013
October, 2013
September, 2013
August, 2013
July, 2013
June, 2013
May, 2013
November, 2012
October, 2012
September, 2012
August, 2012
July, 2012
June, 2012
March, 2012
February, 2012
January, 2012
December, 2011
November, 2011
September, 2011
August, 2011
July, 2011
June, 2011
May, 2011
April, 2011
March, 2011
February, 2011
January, 2011
December, 2010
November, 2010
October, 2010
September, 2010
August, 2010
June, 2010
May, 2010
March, 2010
February, 2010
January, 2010
November, 2009
October, 2009
September, 2009
August, 2009
July, 2009
June, 2009
May, 2009
April, 2009
March, 2009
February, 2009
January, 2009
December, 2008
November, 2008
October, 2008
September, 2008
August, 2008
July, 2008
June, 2008
May, 2008
April, 2008
March, 2008
February, 2008
January, 2008
December, 2007
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
August, 2007
July, 2007
June, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
November, 2006
October, 2006
September, 2006
August, 2006
July, 2006
June, 2006
May, 2006
April, 2006
March, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006
November, 2005
October, 2005
September, 2005
August, 2005
July, 2005
June, 2005
March, 2005
January, 2005
December, 2004
November, 2004
August, 2004
July, 2004
June, 2004
May, 2004
April, 2004
March, 2004
February, 2004
January, 2004
December, 2003
November, 2003
October, 2003
September, 2003
August, 2003
July, 2003
May, 2003
April, 2003
March, 2003
February, 2003
January, 2003
December, 2002

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional
Valid CSS

An Avoidable and Deceptively Benign Distraction which Masks an Intractable Mess

This Story and more specifically this story were the grains of irritant that led to this post.

Also, the second story mentioned how much bloggers were mentioning the controversy, so I seem honor bound to pile on.

For people to lazy to RTFAs, the basic summation is discussing whether the phrases "eenie, meenie, minie, moe" and "tar baby" can ever be used in polite conversation after some very uncouth men used them in horrible contexts dozens of years back. How long does it take a stench to wear off, otherwise suitable words?

"Tar Baby" holds a special place in my heart, since growing up in MN, I had *no* idea it had anything but a positive context of one of my most favorite childhood tales. So when I got big and grown up, and involved in complex problems, it's not suprising that I used it.

The first time my boss pulled me aside and asked me about it, I assured him he must be mistaken. That he simply wasn't familiar with the counter-culture story I was referencing, and must be confusing it with some other type of similar sounding, yet altogether different phrase.

The second time, I heard someone reference that their grandfather in the south often used it as a derogatory term. Well, I'm too much of a guilty liberal to fight that... But yet here I am. Not only defending a possible racial epitaph, but also doing so on timing so that it actually defends a criticism of Tony Snow...

I think the reason I can't let go of it, is that there simply exists no other word, story or even english phrase capable of expressing the idea. I liken it to the phrase "The lady doth protest too much", there is just no other way to say it, no other way to pull off that joke other than that phrase, no alternate way to invoke it.

I suppose there could be a push to rewrite the tale in a more modern context and call it "gluebaby" or something, but that has all the allure of yelling "Gosh" after hurting your thumb. Not to mention it may offend the vegans among us...

Oh well, I suppose I should probably start pointing out how I'm totally not racist, and that the historical context seems to strongly favor it being nothing more than necessary plot, since some might construed that as proof of my masking guilt for past racial indiscresions.

Which would really suck, since I hear the punishment for such infractions is being forcibly moved to Canada, and man, would that ever be terrible.

I mean, it's so cold there, and the health care, it's socialized! No one wants their tax dollars going towards that, especially now that the US dollar is so weak. Also, they're so far north, it'd be a wonder if they even know of the tales of Uncle Remus, let alone their tainted past... So please, I beg you, don't forcibly move me there by hiring moving trucks and selling my over priced American house for one in Canada. Anything but that.

The Madness of King George's Constituents

More Pics - Video

It's finally happened. The above snapshot of the events of the G8 to me, seem so unplausable, that it seems only reasonable that it seems far more likely that I've gone crazy and am no longer interpreting external stimuli correctly, than that the democratically elected man of the world's most powerful nation possesses the tact and social acumen of an eigth grader.

So, I'm glad that's settled. I'm mad as a hatter, and so must be blogging to myself.

Good day to you figments of my own mind, and remind me to brush my teeth tonight.

(My thanks to Meg for the talking points memo link)

Cinemamancy

So, you all should be proud of me. Not for what I've done, for what I have not done. I have had at least 3 preachy half baked political posts I wanted to make, but I didn't. Being a "blogger" you miss the vital sign of someone's eyes rolling back into their heads which provides that tidy real world clue that you're boring the other person in a sleepy submission.

So, in lieu of political science observations from a man who has never taken a political science course in his life, I shall provide you with movie criticism, from a man who has never taken any sort of media class (but, who made several stunning home movies in his youth).

I saw a trailer for a movie.

At first I thought it was Disney rehashing two of it's older movies, and I was against it. Now that I look more closely, it looks to be Warner Brothers behind it, and now I'm in favor of it. I dislike Disney and the way the mess with copyright laws, so any method which degrades their IP through unholy mixes of rehashed kids movies I am all for.

So studio execs, what follows are three kid friendly frankensteins all ready to be green lit! (more)

Search